Skip to content


Senate Committee Approves Demonstration Projects for Partial Repeal of IMD Exclusion

The Senate Finance Committee yesterday amended its version of health reform legislation to partially roll back current Medicaid policy prohibiting reimbursement to inpatient facilities known as institutes of mental disease (IMD).
The amendment, filed by Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), provides $75 million for three-year demonstration projects in up to eight states that would allow federal Medicaid matching payments for emergency psychiatric treatment in psychiatric hospitals that provide services to Medicaid beneficiaries between the ages of 21 and 64.  Currently, psychiatric hospitals are required to provide these emergency services under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, but they cannot receive federal matching payments because of the rules prohibiting IMDs from receiving federal Medicaid reimbursement.
Only non-publicly owned and operated psychiatric hospitals would be eligible to participate in the demonstration projects.  The services eligible for federal payments under the demonstration projects are limited to emergency psychiatric treatment and stabilization.
The intent of the demonstration projects, as described by the Finance Committee, is to “demonstrate that covering patients in these hospitals will improve timely access to emergency psychiatric care, reduce the burden on overcrowded emergency rooms, and improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of inpatient psychiatric care.”  A similar demonstration project was included in the House version of health reform legislation.
The Alliance and UNCA support repealing or rolling back the IMD exclusion.  Click here for our analysis of the IMD exclusion and several options for reform.
A description of all of yesterday’s changes to the Senate Finance bill is available on the Senate Finance Committee website.

The Senate Finance Committee yesterday amended its version of health reform legislation to partially roll back current Medicaid policy prohibiting reimbursement to inpatient facilities known as institutes of mental disease (IMD).

The amendment, filed by Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), provides $75 million for three-year demonstration projects in up to eight states that would allow federal Medicaid matching payments for emergency psychiatric treatment in psychiatric hospitals that provide services to Medicaid beneficiaries between the ages of 21 and 64.  Currently, psychiatric hospitals are required to provide these emergency services under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, but they cannot receive federal matching payments because of the rules prohibiting IMDs from receiving federal Medicaid reimbursement.

Only non-publicly owned and operated psychiatric hospitals would be eligible to participate in the demonstration projects.  The services eligible for federal payments under the demonstration projects are limited to emergency psychiatric treatment and stabilization.

The intent of the demonstration projects, as described by the Finance Committee, is to “demonstrate that covering patients in these hospitals will improve timely access to emergency psychiatric care, reduce the burden on overcrowded emergency rooms, and improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of inpatient psychiatric care.”  A similar demonstration project was included in the House version of health reform legislation.

The Alliance and UNCA support repealing or rolling back the IMD exclusion.  Click here for our analysis of the IMD exclusion and several options for reform.

A description of all of yesterday’s changes to the Senate Finance bill is available on the Senate Finance Committee website.

Posted in Health Care, Medicaid Reimbursement.


One Response

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Ilene Flannery Wells says

    I would like to see evidence of demonstration projects that were used to show that forcing people out of state mental hospitals was a good idea. It killed my brother.

    The IMD Exclusion is discriminatory at best, a human rights violation at worst and needs to be repealed, period.